<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automatix and Upgrading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Is there any mention of the effect of 3rd party software on upgrades (of course mentioning the very popular automatix) in upgrade or release notes? If no, them that would seem reasonable. Maybe the Automatix folks should have a prominent warning of the effect their software has on upgrades, if it is not there?  Having their effort coordinated should definately help with future upgrades and I hope that they work with core folks to make this work for all users.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any mention of the effect of 3rd party software on upgrades (of course mentioning the very popular automatix) in upgrade or release notes? If no, them that would seem reasonable. Maybe the Automatix folks should have a prominent warning of the effect their software has on upgrades, if it is not there?  Having their effort coordinated should definately help with future upgrades and I hope that they work with core folks to make this work for all users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BjÃ¶rn Ottervik</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>BjÃ¶rn Ottervik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I sort of wonder why someone chooses Ubuntu in the first place, if they find the Ubuntu FOSS-approach unnecesary and problematic.

Why not go for Mephis, or any other of a number of distros that dont require you to manualy install proprietary software if you want it?

As for Automatix (as with any other broken software) the solution if for people who know about the problems to advise against it, and to inform the (rediculously high) number of people recommending it to stop doing so - at least untill the problems have been fixed.

I dont think Ubuntu developers should invest time in debugging a nonincluded third party software, when that time could be spent fixing actual problems with Ubuntu itself.
Anyone who wants to help fix Automatix should join the team; not ask another - nonrelated - team to do it for you.

Even better would be for everyone who is troubled by following wiki guides to get DVD decryption, to surf to lauchpad and help draft and design a tool for educating users about free- vs nonfree software, and help them install the nonfree content after making an imformed descicion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sort of wonder why someone chooses Ubuntu in the first place, if they find the Ubuntu FOSS-approach unnecesary and problematic.</p>
<p>Why not go for Mephis, or any other of a number of distros that dont require you to manualy install proprietary software if you want it?</p>
<p>As for Automatix (as with any other broken software) the solution if for people who know about the problems to advise against it, and to inform the (rediculously high) number of people recommending it to stop doing so - at least untill the problems have been fixed.</p>
<p>I dont think Ubuntu developers should invest time in debugging a nonincluded third party software, when that time could be spent fixing actual problems with Ubuntu itself.<br />
Anyone who wants to help fix Automatix should join the team; not ask another - nonrelated - team to do it for you.</p>
<p>Even better would be for everyone who is troubled by following wiki guides to get DVD decryption, to surf to lauchpad and help draft and design a tool for educating users about free- vs nonfree software, and help them install the nonfree content after making an imformed descicion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-81</guid>
		<description>That Tom and Zach want an Ubuntu that does everything out of the box is understandable, but misses the point. Stuff like the windows codecs or DVD decryption are not left out of Ubuntu because of free software zealotry, but because including them is illegal in most jurisdictions.

Making them available within the framework of Ubuntu proper is therefore more complicated than just including them on the CD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Tom and Zach want an Ubuntu that does everything out of the box is understandable, but misses the point. Stuff like the windows codecs or DVD decryption are not left out of Ubuntu because of free software zealotry, but because including them is illegal in most jurisdictions.</p>
<p>Making them available within the framework of Ubuntu proper is therefore more complicated than just including them on the CD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viper</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>viper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Its really simple.  Instead of fighting about it.....work together with them.  TEST the systems that have these installers on them.  (By them, I mean more than just the automatix2 folks.)

Use launchpad.  

F'in COOPERATE.

For everytime someone within ubuntu's "purity section" screams "oh no those automatix SCUM making us look bad!!", come upgrade time, there are a ton of users who would make Arnie and company  saints for making a tedious process...simple.

Automatix 2 is one of the SLICKEST installation programs I've ever had the pleasure to use, and has saved me time and effort in getting multiple machines running  "Properly".  Off the disc, ubuntu is a curiosity to anyone other than perhaps Richard "screw-em-all" Stallman.  It works, but does it do what most folks want it to do?  (mp3/video/dvd/etc?) 

Most of us are practical.  We want/need/will GET the stuff that allows us to function properly in today's current media climate.

Shut that off, and we go somewhere else, and I don't think Canonical would like that very much...do you????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its really simple.  Instead of fighting about it&#8230;..work together with them.  TEST the systems that have these installers on them.  (By them, I mean more than just the automatix2 folks.)</p>
<p>Use launchpad.  </p>
<p>F&#8217;in COOPERATE.</p>
<p>For everytime someone within ubuntu&#8217;s &#8220;purity section&#8221; screams &#8220;oh no those automatix SCUM making us look bad!!&#8221;, come upgrade time, there are a ton of users who would make Arnie and company  saints for making a tedious process&#8230;simple.</p>
<p>Automatix 2 is one of the SLICKEST installation programs I&#8217;ve ever had the pleasure to use, and has saved me time and effort in getting multiple machines running  &#8220;Properly&#8221;.  Off the disc, ubuntu is a curiosity to anyone other than perhaps Richard &#8220;screw-em-all&#8221; Stallman.  It works, but does it do what most folks want it to do?  (mp3/video/dvd/etc?) </p>
<p>Most of us are practical.  We want/need/will GET the stuff that allows us to function properly in today&#8217;s current media climate.</p>
<p>Shut that off, and we go somewhere else, and I don&#8217;t think Canonical would like that very much&#8230;do you????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79</guid>
		<description>While Tom and Zach are understandable in their desire to have "more" in Ubuntu I think their comments reflect their personal needs/wants and don't really address the fundamental issue.

Even if "this" or "that" were included in Ubuntu there is always going to be "something else" that some people are going to want and install separately so some sort of approach to handling the situation is still needed.

It is an interesting problem. I think the solution involves informing the user and being careful not to be unnecessarily perjorative towards third party providers. A similar attitude is needed from third party providers too. 

Some of the discussion around this has been unnerving in a similar way to the Mozilla/Debian issue over FireFox. Not in terms of the subject matter but in terms of a lack of civility, respect and an attempt to understand people with different views on the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Tom and Zach are understandable in their desire to have &#8220;more&#8221; in Ubuntu I think their comments reflect their personal needs/wants and don&#8217;t really address the fundamental issue.</p>
<p>Even if &#8220;this&#8221; or &#8220;that&#8221; were included in Ubuntu there is always going to be &#8220;something else&#8221; that some people are going to want and install separately so some sort of approach to handling the situation is still needed.</p>
<p>It is an interesting problem. I think the solution involves informing the user and being careful not to be unnecessarily perjorative towards third party providers. A similar attitude is needed from third party providers too. </p>
<p>Some of the discussion around this has been unnerving in a similar way to the Mozilla/Debian issue over FireFox. Not in terms of the subject matter but in terms of a lack of civility, respect and an attempt to understand people with different views on the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I want to second tom's comment (he just beat me to it. Automatix/EasyUbuntu/etc. just should not be necessary (install a program that installs other programs). 

I applaud Ubuntu for the priclipled apprach to FOSS. But I am not alone in wanting a GNU/linux system on which I can play a DVD or experience the full potential of my PC hardware. 

I give credit to the Ubuntu development community for the Add/Remove Applications tool and the enhancements over command line apt-get found in Synaptic Package Manager. But even these tools are still overwhelming to new users who want thing to "just work". It seems to me that meta-packages are part of the answer -- the officially supported install tool should be the only thing making these changes to the system. We just need to make it easier to add third party repositories and select appropriate software for our individual needs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to second tom&#8217;s comment (he just beat me to it. Automatix/EasyUbuntu/etc. just should not be necessary (install a program that installs other programs). </p>
<p>I applaud Ubuntu for the priclipled apprach to FOSS. But I am not alone in wanting a GNU/linux system on which I can play a DVD or experience the full potential of my PC hardware. </p>
<p>I give credit to the Ubuntu development community for the Add/Remove Applications tool and the enhancements over command line apt-get found in Synaptic Package Manager. But even these tools are still overwhelming to new users who want thing to &#8220;just work&#8221;. It seems to me that meta-packages are part of the answer &#8212; the officially supported install tool should be the only thing making these changes to the system. We just need to make it easier to add third party repositories and select appropriate software for our individual needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Milone (aka tseliot)</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Milone (aka tseliot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that we should test dist-upgrades to Feisty with our own packages installed.

Matt Zimmerman's spec for Feisty about the codecs would be a good way (at least) to limit the use of apps a la Automatix.

Another thing which Ubuntu should be concerned about is the fact that many people install (up-to-date releases of) the ATI and the Nvidia proprietary drivers by using the installers on ATI or Nvidia's websites. Every time the kernel is upgraded the xserver will crash unless the kernel module is recompiled.

I have made my own repositories in order to provide those drivers:
http://albertomilone.com/driver.html

However I doubt that my repositories (which contain up-to-date ATI and Nvidia drivers) can cause any trouble since they would be updated in the dist-upgrade (since Feisty should have a different kernel from Edgy i.e. 2.6.18 or higher).

I'm convinced that my spec for Feisty could solve the problem:
https://features.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+spec/uptodate-ati-nvidia-driver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that we should test dist-upgrades to Feisty with our own packages installed.</p>
<p>Matt Zimmerman&#8217;s spec for Feisty about the codecs would be a good way (at least) to limit the use of apps a la Automatix.</p>
<p>Another thing which Ubuntu should be concerned about is the fact that many people install (up-to-date releases of) the ATI and the Nvidia proprietary drivers by using the installers on ATI or Nvidia&#8217;s websites. Every time the kernel is upgraded the xserver will crash unless the kernel module is recompiled.</p>
<p>I have made my own repositories in order to provide those drivers:<br />
<a href="http://albertomilone.com/driver.html" rel="nofollow">http://albertomilone.com/driver.html</a></p>
<p>However I doubt that my repositories (which contain up-to-date ATI and Nvidia drivers) can cause any trouble since they would be updated in the dist-upgrade (since Feisty should have a different kernel from Edgy i.e. 2.6.18 or higher).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m convinced that my spec for Feisty could solve the problem:<br />
<a href="https://features.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+spec/uptodate-ati-nvidia-driver" rel="nofollow">https://features.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+spec/uptodate-ati-nvidia-driver</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.netsplit.com/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Don't you think a better way to address the problem would be for Ubuntu to address the holes in the OS that programs like Automatix are attempting to fill?  I know it can't be everything to everyone (or offer every little piece of software available) BUT there are some very obvious (and very proprietary) things (codecs, et all) that are necessary for a useful desktop environment.  Ubuntu has taken a step in the right direction with offering the proprietary Nvidia and ATI drivers in the included repositories but they still have a long way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you think a better way to address the problem would be for Ubuntu to address the holes in the OS that programs like Automatix are attempting to fill?  I know it can&#8217;t be everything to everyone (or offer every little piece of software available) BUT there are some very obvious (and very proprietary) things (codecs, et all) that are necessary for a useful desktop environment.  Ubuntu has taken a step in the right direction with offering the proprietary Nvidia and ATI drivers in the included repositories but they still have a long way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
